Cohen is now recounting how, when he was requested by Jeff McConney for invoices, he in fact “didn’t have a copy of the doc built with Weisselberg.”
“It would’ve been on a retainer agreement, but there was none,” Cohen advised prosecutors.
As a result, Cohen stated, he “created a doc and called it an invoice” requesting “payment for providers rendered for the months of January and February” from Weisselberg.
He ongoing to send these types of files as regular monthly invoices.
Asked by prosecutors about no matter whether expert services experienced actually been rendered, Cohen replied, “No, ma’am.”
Requested no matter whether “for providers rendered” was a “truthful assertion,” Cohen recurring, “No, ma’am.”
The true objective, Cohen discussed: “The reimbursement of hush cash.”
Cohen mentioned “yes” when questioned irrespective of whether the invoice was a “false record” and no matter if “each bill manufactured the identical bogus representation.”
