He’d been hoping for pretty much a yr to chat to the former law enforcement main.
Sgt. Mike Slaughter, a police detective in suburban Philadelphia, required to interview the retired chief, Thomas Mills, about a a long time-aged unsolved homicide. The detective said he had repeatedly gone to Mills’ home and questioned intermediaries to assist broker a meeting. But Mills refused, he stated.
Eventually, in December 2015, the previous chief agreed to a recorded job interview and, after approximately an hour, Slaughter explained he came absent stunned by what Mills advised him: Whilst still a detective in the early 1990s, the former chief had been instructed to “stay away” from a possible suspect in the unsolved killing mainly because of the man’s position with the Bristol Township Law enforcement Department. He was a private informant. His handler was a narcotics detective.
For additional on the situation, tune in to “Justice for Pleasure” on “Dateline at 9 ET/8 CT tonight.
That suspect, Robert Atkins, 58, was inevitably billed, convicted and — before this year — sentenced to lifestyle in jail in the April 19, 1991, murder of Pleasure Hibbs. But the revelation that authorities allegedly “protected” Atkins, as Slaughter put it, left the detective baffled — and Hibbs’ loved ones furious.
“Why a man or woman who could be the murder suspect would be safeguarded just because of their function as a drug informant for our law enforcement division — that does not make sense in any kind of cop math,” Slaughter told “Dateline” in an distinctive job interview.
“I will say this to my last dying breath,” he additional. “You under no circumstances trade off a murder suspect as a drug informant.”
To Hibbs’ son, David Hibbs, there was only a single rationalization for how the circumstance was taken care of.
“They turned the other way, and they lined this up,” he explained to “Dateline.”
Mills died in 2017. Messages left on cellphone figures mentioned as his relations ended up not returned. One more narcotics detective determined in charging documents for Atkins as his handler died in 2018.
In the course of Atkins’ trial, one more officer who worked on the scenario to begin with — the direct murder detective — testified that he had been ordered to back again off Atkins as a achievable suspect and let narcotics investigators to manage that section of the investigation. That detective explained he was instructed that the drug investigators didn’t want any one “screwing up our narcotics bargains.” (The detective declined to talk on digicam with “Dateline.”)
A different previous police chief who the homicide detective reported gave individuals orders is lifeless.
In a statement to “Dateline,” a lawyer for the Bristol Law enforcement Division mentioned local officials are informed of the allegations bordering the investigation into Hibbs’ killing but are unable to comment for the reason that none of them worked for the township in 1991.
The assertion pointed out that in 2015, a new law enforcement chief was tasked with restructuring and reorganizing the department. Two years later on, the section was accredited by the condition.
The main “assures the Bristol Township local community that all criminal investigations are dealt with with the utmost professionalism, integrity and compassion,” the assertion suggests.
A $20 drug deal and a brutal killing
David Hibbs, 45, lengthy considered that Atkins had something to do with his mother’s killing.
Atkins experienced lived two doorways down and his spouse, April, frequently invested time with the target. David Hibbs reported Atkins had a temper: he could hear his neighbor yelling from their property. A number of weeks right before his mother’s killing, he reported, he heard Atkins screaming via the cellphone at his mom.
When he pressed his mother for particulars on the argument, he said, she reluctantly instructed him it was around the quality of a smaller bag of cannabis she’d bought from Atkins.
“My mom was shaken by that dialogue, but I really don’t believe she took it critical since it is a $20 cannabis deal,” David Hibbs said.
Then, on April 19, 1991, authorities responded to a hearth at the family’s dwelling. Inside, firefighters uncovered the victim’s physique. Hibbs was badly burned, and authorities originally thought she was the target of an accidental fire, according to grand jury paperwork in the situation. But an autopsy uncovered she’d been stabbed, overwhelmed and most likely strangled, the paperwork say.
When investigators requested the victim’s son if he knew of everyone who’d want to harm his mother, he reported, he gave them Atkins’ identify.
“He’s the only individual that arrived to head,” David Hibbs explained.
In the months that followed, authorities seemed much more focused on David Hibbs’ father — the victim’s husband — than on Atkins. Charlie Hibbs instructed “Dateline” that he was frequently interviewed and polygraphed, even though he’d been doing the job a development career in Philadelphia at the time of the killing and had multiple witnesses who could ensure exactly where he’d been.
Discouraged with the absence of progress, in 2006 David Hibbs experimented with to attain scenario paperwork from the division with a purpose of having a person else assessment the proof. He explained authorities declined to turn about the file, but a police lieutenant offered his look at of who he considered was dependable for the killing.
“In his feeling, it was my father,” David Hibbs recalled the official indicating. “He was sure it was my father’s fault.”
David Hibbs reported he’d under no circumstances previously considered that his father could have killed his mom, but this new piece of info “made me problem everything.”
He mentioned he never questioned his father specifically about it. But for a time, he largely disappeared from the relationship, Charlie Hibbs recalled.
“He pulled completely away,” he mentioned of his son. “We scarcely communicated.”
‘This situation was never ever supposed to be solved’
By the time Slaughter was assigned to reinvestigate the killing in 2014, the scenario was “frozen,” the detective reported. “It was a block of ice.” He did not imagine he could fix it, but he thought he could at minimum give it a correct update — organize it, categorize it and determine everybody who was even now alive.
As Slaughter started to critique the scenario file, he mentioned he identified there ended up no recorded interviews — just some handwritten and typed records — and tiny forensic proof. Substantially of it experienced been destroyed by the fireplace or the effort and hard work to extinguish it. He finally concluded that Charlie Hibbs had absolutely nothing to do with the killing and that individuals who explained normally “had no concept what they’re chatting about,” he mentioned.
Slaughter experienced observed Atkins’ title in the file, the detective explained, but investigators’ call with him was documented in what he described as a brief paragraph or two.
In his conversations with law enforcement at the time, Atkins denied that he experienced anything to do with the killing, Slaughter said. He instructed authorities that he’d received a cell phone connect with from his wife’s co-worker that working day — a Friday — prior to touring to the Poconos with his household, Slaughter recalled.
Investigators at the time never introduced Atkins to the department to concern him, nor did they obtain cellphone information to corroborate the simply call or its timing, Slaughter mentioned. And there was nothing at all showing that Atkins’ wife was interviewed without him current, Slaughter said — an approach that he explained as “very suspicious.”
“That would be the opposite of what we would want to do,” Slaughter reported.
Not very long just after he started re-analyzing the situation, Slaughter interviewed Atkins yet again. In the April 2014 interview, Atkins recurring his account from 1991 and acknowledged remaining a confidential informant — he’d made use of and sold methamphetamines — for the police division, according to the grand jury documents. Atkins also confirmed that he’d experienced a dispute with the slain girl about the high quality of the cannabis he’d offered her, but he denied possessing anything to do with her killing, the document states.
In a different interview, Atkins’ wife explained she hardly realized the sufferer and experienced almost nothing to do with her dying, Slaughter recalled.
In addition to reviewing the circumstance file and conducting interviews, Slaughter reported, he had also been reaching out to the first detectives, who by then experienced retired or moved away. But most refused to communicate with him, he claimed.
At last, in December 2015, Mills discovered particulars about Atkins that had been nowhere in the circumstance file — like that Mills experienced been told to not go after him as a suspect, Slaughter mentioned.
Slaughter struggled with what he’d uncovered. He reported he experienced affection for the officers who educated and employed him — Mills experienced been main when Slaughter commenced functioning for the section — and he enjoys the department and the command staff members who now operate it. But nobody “ever stepped up and went to the AG’s office environment or condition law enforcement or some other company and said, ‘Hey, we got to glimpse into this,’” Slaughter said.
“This situation was never intended to be solved,” he reported. “It was intended to go nowhere.”
A new revelation
Immediately after the job interview with Mills, Slaughter reported, he shared what he’d acquired with a lieutenant and a sergeant. And he forwarded the situation to the district attorney’s office environment.
A lot more than two years immediately after he first interviewed Atkins’ wife, she showed up at the police office with Slaughter’s business card and explained she essential to talk about anything “really significant,” Slaughter recalled.
Slaughter raced to the station. In the interview that adopted, April Atkins — who’d considering the fact that divorced Atkins — informed him that on the working day of the killing, her partner arrived household putting on bloodstained clothing.
“I looked at him, I stated, ‘What took place to you?’” April Atkins told “Dateline” in her initially job interview about the circumstance. “He arrived to me, in entrance of me, and he claimed, ‘I stabbed anyone and lit a house on fireplace.’”
Atkins informed her to skip operate that day and get their two young young children ready for a vacation to the Poconos, she mentioned. The future working day, when they went for a wander, he was carrying a bag, and at a person point instructed her and the children to halt as he momentarily disappeared.
“When he arrived again, that bag was gone,” she claimed.
In her job interview with Slaughter, April Atkins explained that Atkins’ sneakers could have been in the bag. She acquired who the victim was only following a detective arrived to their house soon after the killing, she informed “Dateline,” and afterwards pressed her husband to convert himself in. But she told “Dateline” that he defeat her when she elevated the matter and threatened to blame her for the murder if she ongoing. (Atkins’ law firm explained his client “absolutely” denies the allegations of abuse.)
April Atkins reported she remained terrified of her husband, even soon after their divorce in 2006, but lastly reached out to Slaughter soon after a sequence of fatalities in her very own everyday living.
As with the Mills job interview, Slaughter stated, he forwarded what he figured out from her to the district legal professional.
It wasn’t until finally May perhaps 2022 — extra than 5 decades just after her revelations to Slaughter — that Atkins was arrested and charged in Joy Hibbs’ killing. Matt Weintraub, a Bucks County choose who in 2022 was the county’s district attorney, declined to comment on why it took decades to cost Atkins, citing “pending/impending character of put up-conviction matters.”
Just after Atkins’ arrest, Weintraub explained to reporters there was “no fantastic rationale, no particular reason” for the hold off. “We have lots of conditions, and some have a tendency to just take priorities over some others,” he said.
Throughout the news convention, a reporter requested if Atkins’ alibi had been completely vetted again in 1991.
“Perhaps other people today that were being positioned differently back again then approved his alibi and possibly didn’t seem underneath every rock as carefully as we have now,” Weintraub explained.
