Live updates: Supreme Court to rule on affirmative action, student loans

Looming Supreme Courtroom affirmative motion ruling has elite schools on edge

Late June is usually a tranquil time on school campuses. Not this year.

On Zoom calls, in functioning groups and in textual content chains, officials at elite colleges are anxiously planning. In days, the Supreme Court docket could bar them from considering race as a aspect in the admissions course of action.

“The real truth is quite a few colleges and universities have been preparing for this working day for a extended time,” Danielle Holley, incoming president of Mount Holyoke College in western Massachusetts, explained in an interview. 

Holley, who was dean of the Howard College University of Legislation for the previous 9 many years, is properly versed in the authorized arguments for and towards applying race in college or university admissions. The daughter of two academics, she has been learning the circumstance regulation considering that she was a young legislation pupil. Now, she’s focused on the useful implications of what the justices could do.

“Race is a vital component of how we do our get the job done in better education,” she mentioned. “We don’t want equipment taken away from us or our palms tied guiding our back again. … I’m very nervous.”

Study the entire tale.

How the Supreme Court docket manufactured it tougher to overturn the 2024 election

The Supreme Court’s ruling Tuesday in a important election case was lousy information for John Eastman — a attorney aligned with Donald Trump who pushed a novel legal principle in his bid to overturn the 2020 election.

Tuesday’s 6-3 ruling rejected a sweeping model of what has been dubbed the “independent condition legislature concept,” which argues that point out legislatures have just about unfettered powers to put into action election regulation, cost-free even of the usual lawful evaluation carried out by state courts.

Eastman, a conservative lawyer, experienced embraced the theory as section of his widely discredited argument that then-Vice President Mike Pence had the power to refuse to certify the 2020 presidential election outcomes.

It unsuccessful then, and the Supreme Court’s new ruling designed it distinct that it and equivalent far-fetched theories will not fly in the 2024 election both.

Go through the complete story.